Janet Wright Starner
|
Composition With Computers: Lehigh's Epiphany Project |
Introduction:
Tales from the Cyberclassroom
by Janet Wright Starner
While these essays vary in form and content,
they share some common themes. All the writers, at some point, discover
that any sane incorporation of technology into a curriculum must be incremental.
And all are frank, honest, and generous in their sharing of successes and
failures. Each writer has attempted to critique his/her experience
against the larger background of theory and other teachers’ experiences
with the same or similar pedagogies. This hypertext collection is
the story of a shared journey.
The
Computer Conference: Asynchronous Writing
by Edward J. Gallagher
Gallagher’s electronic conference board represents
an entry level use. His essay is designed for the curious, the skeptical,
the interested who want to know what it is, how it works, how it fits into
our program, what its advantages are in both practical and theoretical
terms.
Making
a "Claim with Support": The Potential Value of Using Computer-Assisted
Research in the First-Year Composition Classroom
by Harold William Halbert
Halbert’s document problematizes the definition
of "research," contrasting its conception as tool, shared by professional
writers and academics, with that of first-year writing students who see
it as "an end in and of itself, not a means of engaging oneself with an
issue and forming a unique claim."
The
Syllaweb in the On-line Composition Classroom
by Sheila Bauer-Gatsos
In her essay, Bauer-Gatsos straightforwardly
addresses one of the course’s critical issues: "like many readers, I do
worry a bit about people who call computer-mediated composition the ‘Holy
Grail’ of instruction." Her case study concentrates on extending
the boundaries of the traditional classroom by using the World Wide Web
to enhance and supplement course work.
Synchronous
Communication and the Writing Classroom
by Jennifer B. Goldfarb
Goldfarb highlights her experience using the
Daedalus Integrated Writing Environment (DIWE) against the background of
her initial anxieties.Her worries will sound familiar to any who have contemplated,
or tried, teaching in a networked computer classroom.
Hypertext
and Composition
by Tamara Kendig
Kendig’s paper explores the uses of hypertext.
Her experience is particularly interesting because of the fear and resistance
that "teaching" hypertext tends to evoke. This new writing space made possible
by computers is, after all, the antithesis of the freshman essay: it isn't
focused; its argument or narrative doesn't flow linearly; it doesn't have
an obvious point. And yet, it is the very strangeness of reading and writing
hypertext that makes it a valuable teaching tool. Since it is in
many ways the "negative" image of the kinds of compositions first-year
writing courses hope to produce, it throws those products into sharp relief,
providing an opposite against which its positive may be more clearly viewed
by beginning writers.
Playing
in the MUD
by John R.Woznicki
Multiple-user domains (MUDs) and their subsets,
Multiple-use domains/Object Oriented (MOOs) are alternative sites for synchronous
conversations in writing. Woznicki’s project will help readers’ understandings
by categorizing--he places unfamiliar acronyms in spaces that are familiar:
all MOOs are MUDS, but not all MUDS are MOOs. Introducing a fascinating
line of thinking, Woznicki asserts that we ought to reconsider the concept
of "play" in writing instruction.
Concluding
thoughts ~ In Synch With Whom?: Rethinking "Authority" in the Networked
Classroom
by Janet Wright Starner
Of all the many capabilities the computer
can provide writing teachers, the networked environment is most revolutionary
because it allows activities impossible in a traditional classroom. The
hardwired connections between machines and the software that allows users
to "talk" to each other simultaneously transform a room full of fancy typewriters
into a startlingly new communication space. Synchronous writing spaces
of all kinds have been embraced as valuable nearly all the time, and student
interest, engagement, and work ethic are all taken as given. At the same
time, any disasters teachers experience are silenced, explained away by
circumstances, or discounted. And occasionally there is the ever so faint
implication that any failures may, in fact, be blamed on the teacher herself...
If you have questions, comments, or suggestions, email
me at
starner@wilkes.edu or jwrightstarner@worldnet.att.net |
|
URL: http://www.lehigh.edu/~ejg1/cwctoc.html ~ Updated: 5/98 |
|