The idea that would occur to me, if I had to measure the length of a curve, would be to drive a bunch of nails in the blackboard along the curve, and loop a string through those nails (keeping it taut and on the ``right'' side of the nails). Then I'd unwrap it and hold it alongside a ruler. If I wanted to be more accurate, I'd go get more nails.
Let's see how that works without really driving nails into the blackboard. If
the curve is y = f(x) , x Î [a,b] , then we can, as usual, break
the interval from a to b up into a number ( n ) of subintervals,
a = x0 < x1 < ... < xn-1 < xn = b . The nails would then be placed
at the points {(x0,f(x0)),... ,(xn,f(xn))} . The length
of a line segment from (xi-1,f(xi-1)) to (xi,f(xi))
is
|
|
|
|
Example 1 Find the arc-length of the curve y = x3/2 , x Î [0,4] .
|
Example 2
Find the arc-length of the curve y =
x2
2
-
ln(x)
4
,
x Î (2,4] .
|
Example 3
Find the arc-length of the parabola y = x2 , x Î [-2,2]
1This section starts out all wrong in the books. They always talk about defining the arclength of a curve by some formula. We are not really defining the idea of the length of a curve. It seems rather condescending to say that we don't already know what the length of a curve is. That's just a mathematician's way of talking. What they mean to say is that we need to come up with a way of measuring the length of a curve.
Copyright (c) 2000 by David L. Johnson.