What do we mean by an inverse function? The inverse of a function f (don't write as y = f(x) for now, it adds to the confusion) is another function, g , so that g(f(x)) = x , that is, g undoes what f does. Also, it works the other way for the same functions, f(g(x)) = x . We usually call that g by f-1 , even though that is not the same as 1/f(x) as you might think. Another way of writing the relationship between f and f-1 is that
The square root is the standard example of an inverse function.
Now, for the square function f(x) = x2 , it fails the horizontal line test. So, no inverse, move on. But, if you restrict the domain of f to be only the nonnegative reals, x ³ 0 , then, for each y = x2 , there is only one x , and that x is the inverse applied to y . This described the square root function, the inverse of the squaring function restricted to positive numbers.
There is a cheap trick the textbooks have at this point. and that is to mess with what is x and what is y. If y = f(x) is the formula for f , then how do you write the formula for f-1 , the inverse of f , if it exists? One way is to just treat the inverse g as any other function,
Given y = f(x) , how do you find the inverse g , if it does exist (after you straighten out the domain of f so it works)? Well, the easy way is to find it as x = f-1(y) . That way, x plays the same role throughout. Thinking along those lines, if y = f(x) , then for that x and that y , f-1(y) = x , since f-1 undoes what f does, so you go forward and back, x® y, y® x . The method is to simply solve the equation y = f(x) for y in terms of x. If the solution makes sense, the inverse exists, and there is the formula.
Example 1 If f(x) = 2x+1x-1 , find the formula for the inverse function g = f-1 .
Solution
Exercise 1 Find the inverse of f(x) = x3-1 . f-1(x) =
The basic technique to find derivatives of an inverse function f-1(x) in terms of the derivative of the original function f(x) is one case of a more general trick, called implicit differentiation.
Some functions are not given explicitly as a formula, but implicitly in that the function (usually called y ) appears in an equation involving it and the variable x . The prototype is the equation
y is defined by this as the function which takes a given x to the number y that fits with x in that equation. Of course, in this case we can solve for y explicitly,
±? That's not a function. But, in a small enough region, (from x = -1 to x = 1 ), starting at (0,1) , say,
It's really quite easy to differentiate these functions; in fact it's often easier to differentiate them than it is to solve for them explicitly. Just differentiate both sides of the equation, using the chain rule.
Exercise 2 Find dydx at (2,1) using implicit differentiation, if: y3x+yx2+y5 = 11 .
In the particular case of an inverse
Now differentiate both sides implicitly,
Example 2 Use implicit differentiation to find the derivative of Öx. Solution
Exercise 3 If f(x) is a function whose derivative satisfies the equation f¢(x) = ( f(x)) 2, find the derivative of f-1(x) . ( f-1(x)) ¢ =
Email Address (Required to submit answers):
Copyright (c) 2000 by David L. Johnson.