lim x® 2 | f(x) = 13 |
|
lim x® 1 | f(x) |
|
lim x® 1 | f(x) = 1 |
lim x® 1 | f(x) |
This example stresses the predictability of values of the function. This function is bad in that it doesn't have the expected value at 1. The previous example had no value that f(1) should be; from one side it should be one thing, from the other side it should be another. But f has to have just one value.
lim x® 0 | f(x) |
f(x) = |
x3+1 x2-1 |
lim x® -1 | f(x) = |
-3 2 |
lim x® ¥ |
x |
lim x® ¥ |
x3+x2x-6 x3+5 |
lim x® 1- |
1 x-1 |
lim x® ¥ |
x2+5x-6 x3+x+5 |
Examples
1) Show that
lim x® 1 | 3x+5 = 8 |
2) Show that
lim x® 2 | x2+3x = 10 |
3) Show that
lim x® 3 |
1 x | = |
1 3 |
4) Find a number d sufficiently small so that the distance from f(x) = 2x2+3x-1 to 4 is less than 1/100 if |x-1| < d.
Example 1
Compute
lim
x® 3
x2+2x-1
x3-3x2+2
.
Example 2
Compute
lim
x® -1
Ö
x3+2x+7
.
To be fair, we really don't have the theory to claim this, but we can argue
simply that, since
|
lim x® -1 | x3+2x+7 = (-1)3+2(-1)+7 = 4 |
lim x® -1 | Ö |
x3+2x+7 | = 2 |
Example 3
Compute
lim
x® 9
x2-81
Öx-3
.
Example 4
Define
Find
f(x): =
ì
ï
í
ï
î
___
Öx-4
,
if x > 4
8-2x,
if x < 4
.
lim
x® 4
f(x)
, if it exists.