Wednesday, April 04, 2007

History Lessons: From the Sepoy Mutiny (1857) to Iraq (Today)

I'm sorry I've been a slack blogger of late -- I was finishing up another article for a journal, this time on blogging, anonymity, and the changing concept of "authorship." It would be a shame to neglect this blog just as I'm starting to write professionally about blogging!

*

At any rate, here's one recommendation: last week's Radio Open Source conversation with William Dalrymple. Many of the points Dalrymple makes will be familiar to people who have been following the reviews of his new book, The Last Mughal. (I blogged about it here)

What is new in this conversation is the attempt to make a direct parallel between the changing behavior of the British in the months and years leading up to the Mutiny, and the attitude of today's neo-conservative Hawks on the policy of "regime change" and "spreading democracy" around the Middle East.

The show was inspired by Ram Manikkalingam's excellent review of the book (along with Imperial Life in the Emerald City) up at 3 Quarks Daily.

Manan Ahmed, ("Sepoy" of Chapati Mystery -- highly appropriate to this topic) also makes an appearance in the last 20 minutes, talking about the work postcolonial historians have been trying to do to bring forward the kinds of stories Dalrymple's book focuses on.

The entire show is available for downloading as an MP3; if you are into downloading podcasts, this might be a good one. Otherwise, if you have 40 minutes, you might just want to listen to it right on the web.

Labels: , , , , , ,

1 Comments:

Sourav said...

What I found interesting in the interview was the reason William Dalrymple gave for the success of The Last Mughal in India - the dearth of biographers and works in history coming out of India.

I found an interesting article by a guy who detests William Dalrymple and particularly his deliberate ignorance of the Jewish standpoint in the Middle East. He then talks about Dalrymple's love affair with Muslims in India, and how he is needlessly romanticizing what was essentially (with very few exceptions) a slave state under tyrannical Islamic rule.

3:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home